Digital Repository

Social returns from drinking water, sanitation and hygiene education: a case study of two coastal villages in Kerala

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pushpangadan, K.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-14T06:01:13Z
dc.date.available 2019-06-14T06:01:13Z
dc.date.copyright 2002 en_US
dc.date.issued 2002-05
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/231
dc.description.abstract Social returns from investing in water supply, sanitation and hygiene education (WATSANGENE) have been estimated from the UNICEF model of water supply, sanitation and hygiene after modifying it using Sen’s commodities and capabilities approach. The various characteristics of the commodity, WATSANGENE, affect significantly the functioning levels of people with respect to poverty, health, longevity, education and quality of environment. Among them, education, longevity and quality of environment have not been evaluated because of the high degree of subjectivity in their measurement leading to wide margin of errors. Hence, only two of them - poverty and health- have been taken up for valuation by case study method and by “with” and “without” project approach. For the case study, two villages from the coastal belt of Kerala inhabited mainly by fishing community were selected. The study clearly shows that the social benefits are underestimated if the travel time is valued by shadow wage rate instead of by the value of energy expended. For example, the value of time saved “with the project” is only 35 % of the value of energy expended for fetching drinking water from distant sources. In the case of sanitation, it is only 25 % of the value of energy expended. The averted annual public expenditure per household resulting from the elimination of water borne and sanitation related illness with the project is Rs.682. The private annual expenditure per household for treating illness is Rs.510. The cost of providing water supply, sanitation and hygiene per household is Rs. 12,086. The ratio of benefit (present value of the recurring expenditure) to cost is 3.6 in the case of shadow pricing of travel time and 9 in the case of energy expenditure method. This result supports strongly that capabilities approach should be used for the valuation of benefits from water supply, sanitation and hygiene education. The study shows that provision of WATSANGENE in the coastal belt qualifies even under commercial borrowing. en_US
dc.format.extent 40 en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Centre for Development Studies en_US
dc.source Centre for Development Studies en_US
dc.subject social returns, UNICEF model, capabilities and functionings, shadow pricing, valuation of energy loss en_US
dc.title Social returns from drinking water, sanitation and hygiene education: a case study of two coastal villages in Kerala en_US
dc.type text en_US
dc.publisher.date 2002-05
dc.publisher.place Trivandrum en_US
lrmi.learningResourceType book en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CDS Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account